Defined purpose
Specify what AI is being used for, what information it may use, and what remains outside scope.
Responsible AI governance
Governance consulting for behavioral health, healthcare, digital health, and human-service organizations using AI or automation in clinical, operational, or service workflows. The work focuses on clear boundaries, appropriate human review, privacy, verification, escalation, and accountable implementation.
Core principles
Responsible use begins with the purpose of the technology, the consequences of error, the people affected, and the human role that remains accountable.
Specify what AI is being used for, what information it may use, and what remains outside scope.
Name the person or role responsible for consequential decisions, review, and approval.
Define how outputs and actions are checked, when uncertainty requires review, and when the technology must stop or escalate.
Maintain appropriate documentation, monitoring, access controls, and review so responsibility remains visible.
Governance scope
Clinical and human-service environments require more than a general AI policy. Governance should reflect real workflows, privacy obligations, consequence levels, professional roles, client or patient impact, and the organization's ability to review what happened.
A policy alone does not establish responsible use. Teams also need clarity about what information AI may access, when human review is required, which actions are permitted, how results are verified, how exceptions are handled, and what is documented for quality and accountability.
Explore an AI governance projectEngagement
A focused consultation can clarify the intended use, people affected, clinical or operational consequences, existing safeguards, and the human authority that should remain responsible.